https://web-framework.com, a lightweight PHP framework on Slim and PHP-DI for ORM, caching, auth, etc. (an alternative to Laravel/Symfony for small apps).

MinIO gutted the UI recently. Actually fully removed it from the codebase.

So you either have to stick to a vulnerable version or have no een UI.

This form seems to target just that. So for the UI kinda similar actually.

On Chromium-based browsers, if you open the Developer Tools (F12 or Inspect in right click) and you go to the Network tab, you can click 'Disable Cache'.

In my experience, this solves the sticky 301 issue and you should have no issues with cached 301s anymore.

Works perfect for these kind of investigations or if you made a mistake during site development.

Of course, there are ways to clear it but that’s never something you could expect a non-technical user to do.

Yeah the scatter-gun spam is different.

From my experience with coding parts of Un-static [1], the advantage of having a single source for submissions for thousands of forms, is that you can filter out these more easily as well. As you can create partial fingerprints. Then just compare similarity between incoming submissions on other forms. And of course start blocking if you receive a scatter-gun message that matches partial fingerprints received across an increasing number of form endpoints.

[1]: https://un-static.com

You can also enable vi editing in Obsidian. I don't think you can enable vi navigation though.

I'm interested to hear what the advantage over Obsidian is?

It being FOSS is an advantage to some folks. Obsidian doesn't allow you to use it for business for free unless you meet specific criteria like having 2 or less employees.

I never understand this argument when it's used against Obsidian. First, free != FOSS. Second, while the app is closed source, Obsidian has a large open source community that develops plugins for it. Third, the format (markdown) is open, so you have much more freedom than what you have with other FOSS applications that use custom formats.

Open plugins are meaningless when the platform itslelf isn't open. There are also lots of markdown centric note software so its not too much of a draw for obsidian. Personally I'd never use a proprietary note app, having to switch if the company shutters is too much, at least FOSS apps can be forked. Though, I've not heard anything bad about the obsidian team, maybe they open source it if they shut down. They also don't seem like the type to rugpull their customers. But you know how many companies people have said that about.

Open plugins do have a meaning for many developers even if the platform itself isn't open. The meaning is: developers can easily find reference code to develop their own plugins and can easily patch open plugins when they break.

Gratis vs libre.

You openly acknowledged that Obsidian isn't open source. There's lots of open source software for Windows and macOS, yet neither Windows nor macOS are open source. Strange counter-argument in which you proved my point.

Name these FOSS apps that use custom formats. There's so many Obsidian-likes that are not only FOSS, but also use non-proprietary flat markdown files. It sounds like you're drinking too much of the Obsidian community Kool-Aid and trying to convince yourself of these things that simply aren't true.