Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | atrus's commentslogin

So many underscores for usernames, and yet, other than a newly created account, there was 1 other username with an underscore.

In 2032 new HN usernames must use underscores. It was part of the grandfathering process to help with moderating accounts generated after the AI singlarity spammed too many new accounts.

my hypothesis is they trained it to snake case for lower case and that obsession carried over from programming to other spheres. It can't bring itself to make a lowercaseunseparatedname

Most LLMs, including Gemini (AFAIK), operate on tokens. lowercaseunseparatedname would be literally impossible for them to generate, unless they went out of their way to enhance the tokenizer. E.g. the LLM would need a special invisible separator token that it could output, and when preprocessing the training data the input would then be tokenized as "lowercase unseparated name" but with those invisible separators.

edit: It looks like it probably is a thing given it does sometimes output names like that. So the pattern is probably just too rare in the training data that the LLM almost always prefers to use actual separators like underscore.


The tokenization can represent uncommon words with multiple tokens. Inputting your example on https://platform.openai.com/tokenizer (GPT-4o) gives me (tokens separated by "|"):

    lower|case|un|se|parated|name

Or even not locally!

While I get you're trying to highlight jkr's anti-trans opinion, both can be true. You can be an asshole, while also being subject to other assholes behavior.

I read all of her tweets but I don't know of any anti-trans statements by Rowling. I'd appreciate it if you could point one out.

I haven't heard her say that there's anything wrong with being trans, that it's an illness, or that there should be any consequences. I have heard her decry the excesses of some trans activists and allies, particularly in her defense of women-only spaces. That seems to me to be a poor fit for "asshole".


This is something she wrote on Twitter... JK Rowling wrote, "There are no trans kids. No child is 'born in the wrong body'. There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that ends up wrecking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined."

[flagged]


I hope one day you get the courage to say your real opinions on your main account. It must be hard living in fear of being banned from hackernews.

[flagged]


You live a hard life my friend

She deals exclusively in dogwhistles.

Using a dogwhistle instead of more well-known hate speech does not mean a person is innocent of bigotry - quite the opposite.


Just because you agree with them doesn't make them not anti-trans - it just means you agree with anti-trans things.

I mean it’s pretty straightforward - due to trauma over her past experiences with sexual assault at the hands of cis men, she now sees trans women as a facade used by predatory cis men to sexually assault cis women in bathrooms and locker rooms and other segregated spaces.

To her, trans women are really cis men pretending to be women, to make it easier to rape them. There’s kind of no nice way of saying it.

It’s textbook transphobia / queer bashing. Fear of sexual assault at the hands of queer people is probably one of the most basic reasons to justify this particular brand of bigotry. “I don’t hate queers, I’m just concerned for the safety of -“ take your pick - women, children, sometimes even men. For JK it’s women.


[flagged]


Who gets to decide whether they are men or not? Is it you?

Why should you know better than them?


It's because they are male, obviously.

"Man" is the word we use to describe an adult person who is male.


Ah but what if I don’t subscribe to your belief system?

‘Man’ js the word tradition taught you to describe an adult person who is male - but what does that mean, really? Is it a person with a penis? If a man’s penis is removed, what is he then? Prefer his genitals at birth, maybe? What if he’s born without a penis? Intersex people exist. Chromosomes perhaps? There are all sorts of extant combinations beyond XX and XY.

The real question you should be asking is, why does it matter? how does this belief in men and women serve you? It seems to me like your insistence in following this tradition is actually hurting you, not helping you, because it’s narrowing your understanding of your fellow humans, to the point where you can confidently say things like “it’s because they’re male obviously” as if that doesn’t make you look incredibly foolish by modern standards.

At the very least, you may want to consider keeping your belief in gender mythology to yourself.


The idea that men can become women by self-decree is a niche ideological view. It's quite a stretch to call this "modern standards" when hardly anyone really believes this.

Your hypothetical male who lost his penis or was born with an underdeveloped one is clearly still male despite this. There is a misogynistic tradition going all the way back to Aristotle that women are merely deformed men, but in this day and age I hope we can move on from such ignorance.


"We" is an assumed group of people who agree with you.

The alternatives - that "man" and "woman" are identities that anyone of either sex can claim, or that "man" and "woman" are defined by a narrow set of cultural stereotypes - are very niche definitions that should be disregarded as, respectively, absurd and sexist.

Steam DRM is entirely optional. Blame the publishers for DRM.


Valve doesn't disclose ahead of purchase whether a title has Steam DRM or not. So even if publishers don't take the option, I have no way to know that. Which means the option effectively doesn't exist.


The publisher could certainly mention it in their product blurb or in the additional notes under system requirements, if they thought to or thought the market would care.


It's true, before copyright existed, no one made any art at all, and they certainly weren't paid for it. Thanks to copyright, the large majority of artists have been well and fairly compensated for their work.


Okay, you're right. I mean, there was patronage for a long time, and then a good era of proper copyright protections. The modern system really does need a reform, I agree. But I don't think we should wholesale put everything in the public domain. I mean, AI scrapers already think that's the case, but…


It's not just AI scrapers, it's the entire concept of the internet.

The internet _wants_ to copy bytes. That's what it does. Right now you're reading this because bytes were copied from my local machine to the HN server, and then to a cache, and then to your machine.

Copying bytes is, in some low-level sense, the entire function of interconnection in the human species.

The idea of trying to bolt-on little machines to restrict the flow of bytes at every vector of network connectivity, just to satisfy some abstract claim of "property" - it's completely nuts. It's never going to work. Tomorrow it will work worse than it does today, and every day going forward until states realize that the laws they want to enforce around this concept are simply not possible on the internet.

And you know who will celebrate that? Musicians like me. Nobody will be happier to see a lubricated copying machine become the human identity more than people who are trying to get their music out there, and trying to be inspired by the music of others.


It was at a point where they were going to fast to stop or land safely. At that point you're just trying to pick the best place to crash.


I see a lot of complaints about the font, and I'm just curious what makes it so hard to read? Is English your second language, I know reading Japanese for me in different or (worse!) handwritten makes it 10x harder for me to read. Are you just not used to a handwritingish font, and only read more typewritery fonts? Older than me (35+)?

It just feels weird that a perfectly legible font has multiple complaints, and I don't understand why or how?


I think the font is just "different" enough that it sets off something in people.

Ironically, it's also the default font used by Excalidraw (Virgil IIRC), and people seem to generally like the style + legibility of Excalidraw-drawn diagrams.


To me, it's not the font face in particular, but that it's sized too small for the complexity of the font face, specifically.


The font is very small. And unusual.


The vast majority of people.


A possible challenge, yes, but there exist 1500w, standard outlet hpwh, and it's a lot less common to not have any power near a water heater.


A 1500W electric water heater would be painful to use in a home. A typical 30-60 gallon EWH is 6kW.

And for the record, every single natural gas water heater is connected to 120V power for the ignition circuit.


> every single natural gas water heater is connected to 120V power for the ignition circuit

Mine isn't. During a long power outage, I still had hot water.

I was a bit surprised the water heater was working since I was pretty sure it had an electronic control system. So I went and looked, and sure enough, it was electronic, and somehow the LED was flashing blue like normal!

It turns out the electronics are powered by a thermopile which is heated by the pilot light.


> And for the record, every single natural gas water heater is connected to 120V power for the ignition circuit.

This is incorrect. Multiple homes I've lived in had no electric to the water heater, including my current.

With a standing pilot a thermopile is used to generate the tiny bit of electric required for the control.


a 1500W heat pump water heater with a COP around 3 will put 5500 watts of heat into the water.

My Rheem hybrid 220v heat pump water heater only has a 500w compressor but puts 1500-2000 watts of heat into the water pulling it from the hot garage.

I have the choice to run it in high demand mode which will run both the heat pump and electric 4500w element for around 6kw of heat into the water if I need fast recovery.


Keep in mind that there's going to be a CoP associated with a heat-pump water heater. Depending on (a bunch of factors) that 1500W HPWH could approach the performance of a 6kW standard EWH.


Yeah, I neglected to compare my hypothetical 6kW EWH against a 1500W HPWH, and did it against a 1500W EWH.

Heat pumps have no problem operating at a COP of 3-4, so the 120V 12A (1440kW) HPWH would be equivalent to a 240V 25A EWH (6kW)


AFAIK there are actually no 1500w HPWHs currently, the normal hybrid 220v models have a small 500 watt compressor thats very efficient and keeps the airflow requirements low which helps with installation placement and ducting if needed, then still have the electric elements if needed to boost.

The 120v model HPWH's I have seen do not have electric resistive elements and instead have around a 1000W compressor, so they recover faster purely on heat pump and can run off a standard 15 amp circuit while staying well under the NEC 80% rule which would be 12 amps, they are closer to 10 amps.

They do require more airflow and are generally noisier due to larger fans and compressor.

Then you have dedicated split system HPWH's like SANCO that use an outdoor unit like a minisplit and pull around 1800 watts putting well over 6kw into the water, these are probably the future or whole house heat pump systems that heat both water and air(and cool) as combined unit.


It's not uncommon for a gas heater to have an always on pilot.


I completely forgot about thermopiles. And also that heat pump water heaters exist :facepalm:

Thanks for catching that :)


I think this is right...

kwatts_effective [kJ/s] * heating_time_minutes [min] * 60 [s/min] * COP = 4.184 [kJ/kg/K] * (T₁-T₀) [K] * gallon_capacity [gal] * 3.785 [L/gal] * 1 [kg/L]

6.6 kW, for... COP 4, T₁-T₀ = 30 [K] (lower value for warm climate), allowable 30 minute heating time, 50 gallon capacity. A cold climate could double that power requirement, or alternatively double the heating time.


I wouldn't find it amazing, there are so many new models, features, ways to use models that the minute you pause to take a deep dive into something specific, 43 other things have already passed by you.


I would agree if you are a normal dev who doesn't work in the field. But even then reading the documentation once a year would have brought you insane benefits regarding this particular issue. And for ML researchers there is no excuse for stuff like that at this point.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: