How is that a sign of a site built with AI if most people would use the defaults the same way AI is doing ?

> It's like Bootstrap 10 years ago

What do you mean there ?

Highly pervasive, first step people do before starting new projects is setting up stuff like Tailwind, Shadcn; they also don't bother much with modifying how it looks since it looks decent out of the box causing similar looking websites everywhere; similar to how the Bootstrap craze was back from 2012-2015/6; where all websites just looked the same[0]

[0]: Example of the common "Bootstrap style" https://getbootstrap.com/2.3.1/assets/img/examples/bootstrap...

How is it vendor locking if you are writing Python code you can pull out any time ?

+1 all Colab files are the standard Jupyter .ipynb extension: we very much want to avoid any notion of lock-in. We bundle them all into a folder for you in Drive: it takes you like a second to take all of your work to any competitor.

Some are saying replacing video could be abused. What if they that came with Youtube resetting the views count ?

I see Wolof is under "Upcoming UD Languages", I know nothing about R but I see what I can contribute and/or get from there. Thanks!

Thanks for your reply. If you don't mind sharing a link to your company's website or products, I would appreciate.

These are some areas of interest to me : 1- Translation : ie French->Wolof 2- Speech understanding & question answering systems 3- Text to speech .. among others. (I will work day and night to build training samples if I have the tools)

Sure, the company is Babelscape (http://babelscape.com). For the translation tasks you can find massive parallel dataset with several language pairs at http://opus.nlpl.eu/, the other two things that you mentioned are not really in my area of expertise so nothing comes to my mind at the moment.

I'm sorry this was not clear : I was not talking about taxing bitcoin, but collecting tax payed with bitcoin. People would be asked or required to pay tax but I didn't intend it to be enforced with bitcoin.

They say "money is the root of all evil". If they rule on that, why not ? The same consensus on Bitcoin design (although indirect) can apply.

Names are totally random, not checked against any dictionary, that's what I thought was fun. It would be hard to appreciate the goodness of a name, at least programmatically, how would you do that ?

tenken is right, I meant to say "not let names have vulgar connotations in other languages." In the example above, the name started with "culo", which translates into "ass" in Spanish. Here's an example of a service that does that: http://wordsafety.com/

Nevertheless, it's a pretty cool idea! :)

He's saying be sure the generator doesn't sound like a bad name in any language.

I'd say make a dictionary of bad words and their syllble sounds. Then disallow close Levienstein based words....

Levenstein is an absolute metric, I think something like soreson-dice would be more useful.

Regardless, if you take the short keywords and blacklist them by approximation with curse words from several languages I think it would be really hard to get something at all.

"Warning Given URL is not allowed by the Application configuration: One or more of the given URLs is not allowed by the App's settings. It must match the Website URL or Canvas URL, or the domain must be a subdomain of one of the App's domains."

I don't know for Reatjs but you can be shorter with jQuery : http://jsbin.com/pumocohiyu/1/edit?html,css,js,output

And this is even shorter : http://jsbin.com/redaqofoqo/1/edit?html,css,js,output

What I wanted to point out is that the complexity of the algorithm YOU choose is not a good basis to compare libraries on.

Exactly. Testability, ability to render on server and overall readability and a slew of other points make for a good basis.