Yeah I agree. Though it is hard to tell if LLMs are capable of "easy" creativity like that though because anything that easy has already been done many times in its training set.
You've have to invent some new domain I guess and see if it could be creative within that domain. Difficult to think of a good test though.
If at some point a competent senior software engineer can be automated away, I think we are so close to a possible 'AI singularity' in as much as that concept makes sense, that nothing really matters anyway.
I don't know what will be automated first of the competent senior software engineer and say, a carpenter, but once the programmer has been automated away, the carpenter (and everything else) will follow shortly.
The reasoning is that there is such a functional overlap between being a standard software engineer and an AI engineer or researcher, that once you can automate one, you can automate the other. Once you have automated the AI engineers and researchers, you have recursive self-improving AI and all bets are off.
Essentially, software engineering is perhaps the only field where you shouldn't worry about automation, because once that has been automated, everything changes anyways.
