I thought of ulfheim too and it redirects to the new site.
Author's reasoning:
> A few years ago a hate group started using the "ulfheim" name for their own purposes. It's useless trying to reclaim a word, so I'm moving to the domain "http://xargs.org".
I create most of my transactions with a script reading my bank and card statements. The description in the statements are usually good enough to map them to the correct account. I also added snippets to my editor for adding entries (I use a text-based accounting system).
>MILES: [MUSIC] They were able to get ahold of T-Mobile and manipulate their way
in through either doing it in person or doing it over the phone, and convince
somebody to change out the SIM for them.
Why not compare it with t.rotate(rotateBy, around)? Could a,v used for many purposes and this example allows us to indicate their role for this specific call?
Because a and v would be more typical variable names than rotateBy and around. Note that the author did not change the variable names in the translation process, they left them alone. So you could drop any variable in there but the calling of rotate becomes clearer (subjective) by switching to keywords and no longer relies on programmer discipline to have good variable names.
And yes, they probably could be used for other purposes. The names are mnemonics for "angle" (a) and "vector" (v). How you arrive at them and what you'd use them for could easily vary across a system.
Because those are names the caller decided upon, so they can just as easily misinform the reader as correctly educate them. The caller could have mistyped the call as
t.rotate(around, rotateBy)
and the error in the effect might seem very mysterious indeed. The beauty of keyword args is that the mapping of caller's name to function argument name is explicit, and therefore reads correctly or incorrectly immediately at the callsite
t rotateBy: point around:degrees
is obviously an error, without sending the reader to look up the definition.
Compiler-enforced clarity rather than relying on every individual piece of client code to always name things well & never make a mistake.
Thanks this seems to be the closest. On the search results page the Pinterest results still appear, but without a link to the site, so you see floating paragraphs. On the image results page the pinterest results do seem to disappear.
I tried setting the upward() to 2, but that got rid of all the image results.
Excellent, thanks. I am so glad to have that pinterest shit out of my search results. Companies that try to take over your life, even in small ways, should all fall apart.
