aeonik says >"We don't know exactly how consciousness works in the human brain, but we know way more than "comes from the abyss"."<
You are undoubtedly technically correct, but I prefer the simplicity, purity and ease-of-use of the abysmal model, especially in comparison with other similar competing models, such as the below-discussed "tarpit" model.
1. The part I was responding to was in comparison "to every other form of green energy". None of those other things you list are green energy, and your numbers are incorrect for space purposes anyway as they don't include the mass of the oxygen.
2. Energy-density-vs-mass is relevant for the rocket equation when you burn it as a fuel (and, optionally, use as reaction mass), but not vs. PV where you don't burn it and lose it.
e.g. ion drives, magnetic sails of various kinds, launch loops/space elevators and similar, space stations/bases/almost all planetary industry (which can be PV powered), nor solar sails which directly use the momentum of light (usually the sun's nearly isotropic emission, but in a grand space empire anywhere from here to K2 all bar the entropy losses can be pumped into a single direction by lasers).
You can't stop innovation across the planet, you will lose control over time as adversaries continue to innovate and subsume antiquated control structures.
I dunno about the last part. Rich people under 60 seem to be under the impression they might live forever, either biologically or digitally. Within our lifetime we see people trying to make their digital twin their legal heir.
I get the longevity angle (even if I think it’s not possible or even desirable) but digital twin I don’t understand.
It’s like a different person altogether. Even if it was possible to completely clone a persona digitally it would not be you but someone else.
I totally agree with the ridiculousness of it, but that's not going to stop people with outsized egos from trying. Or companies that are trying to ride the coattails of a cult of personality.
Nah it’s more complicated than that. They need to lie to themselves first. They need to build a scaffold of logic that proves and justifies there actions before they do it.
Hitler for example thought he was justified. And so do all the people who claim global warming isn’t real.
Yet it’s a mistake companies and societies repeatedly make, because human brains are wired for zero sum games and paranoia. When you have it, the instinct is to clutch and guard and hoard not grow and expand.
When a company or a society is threatened the usual response is to double down on things that accelerate decline like killing novelty and innovation.
These things worked when we were small primates fighting over limited food sources on the savannah. Our brain stems don’t know what millennium they are in and still run those programs.
Which is exactly what our system encourages. You don’t need to think beyond the next quarter / election cycle. You’re only in it to extract as much wealth in the short-term as possible and secure your chair before the music stops playing.
Currently the biggest US companies are throwing hundreds of billions into an uncertain bet that may pay off in a decade or so while everyone around is screaming "bubble" at them.
It looks like long term risky bet on new technology to me - exactly what you want those rich capitalist do.
This helps a LOT with games, especially new ones needing the latest drivers or hardware support.