If they avoid calling it a proximity bonus and call it an on-call bonus, legal may have some footing to pass on to HR. Though this is only an issue for existing operations.
If its an 8 hour workday, being able to make hypothetical emergency briefings at the office within 2 hours with no/short notice may be worth a 25% salary hike.
Its the new remote first companies that will exclusively hire for skill and balance the equation once the next wave gains more traction.
The human condition is unique to individuals the world over.
If lifestyle and/or environmental conditions were not enough to derail a healthy mind, the information streams run with psychopath+ variables are sure to catch many who didn`t fall through the cracks (given enough time).
If the imbalance is artificial or synthetic in nature, the corner to turn is now.
The quality of an individuals information diet holds the key for many (IMHO). This also leaves room for medical conditions and other reasonable observations that may cause an imbalance of this type.
The DB implementation of PA is the ultimate turn-key avenue if its indistinguishable in the markets from ML.
The could just call it artificial light, prepivot the marketing and open up a new field in the mind of the customers if its just a friendly game of spin the data among nerds.
Revenue per square foot does not directly apply to this (yet), but just like the casino/gambling industries going online, the serendipity still exists for all involved.
Somethings in life are about the "Fantastic User Experience"... Silicon Valley can be digitized in much the same way with all of the best parts intact.
Businesses are only concerned with ethics if it improves their bottom line. 'Free' money in uncertain times is an opportunity any business will seize if it has the means to obtain it.
We are 15 days into SIP at this point. I do not need PPP/EIDL, but as a prior SBO, I followed this topic with interest. The quality of info was high and SB's had days and sometimes weeks notice on navigating the process.
I read that CVT went on to make $300k a day on YT (somedays) by providing daily updates on stimulus, PPP, EIDL, etc, so the incentive was there to get the word out.
If race is a factor, you'll find it was being discussed in their circles with the same delivery as Brian on YT. If not.. They should have picked a better accountant.
By recognizing pitchfork royalty for what it is (a chaotic mess of revenge, hate and anger without a head).
The twitter thread shows a feast of vitriol that attempts to mock racism. Unfortunately, the dancing over dead bodies metadata makes AI sad :(
Hate breeds hate... and their babies are ugly...
This is the reality of fact checking:
{GC
@G3chan
·
12h
Replying to
@JohnRizkallah
@pattonoswalt
i think a company also called solid8 in UK unaffiliated with him is getting abuse. Can we make sure at least their family business isn't ruined as they have nothing to do with him. They are receiving threats etc though and bad reviews in mistaken identity}
If you could go back (asking the last few posts on this link), would you delay the start of a family?
My bet is that the author sets/follows a 21st century trend that delays clicking on the family.exe or ransomware.exe email attachment :).
Knowledge work should get better with age compared to physical labor, so there may be around 2 decades on the table (married at 25 vs 45) that you are reallocating from your retired years into your prime ones, leaving upwards of 50 years to raise a family.
It may even make being a healthy octogenarian a better wind-down experience compared to the current timeline for knowledge workers in place.
The late-bloomer economy is non-existent (speaking from experience), but this could very well change to accomodate the articles narrative.
I haven't had to synchronize my biological clock to anyone yet (code for lucky) and think the Porsche analogy is a little outdated for how much time is really worth.
Just to entertain an introverted perspective, flexible exploitation models (gig), narcissistic tendencies (creator) and cult followings (participatory) have "bad haircut" written all over them (someone will sport them though, Just ask Karen).
The added ponzi feel of crypto (hot start, flat finish) would require some pretty keen foresight/vision to counter the fad status returns.
From an extroverted POV, it sounds like paradise and an opportunity to grow with an extended circle (of global friends, peers, mentors,etc) outside of your local scene, though that brochure has been popular for ages now (digitally).
If you can avoid the pitfalls of greed, "social economics" and mental illness podiums (social 1.0), you may very well provide an alternative to the previous economic models.
In the quest to seperate business from pleasure, I think the participatory economy leaves much to be desired, but even WFA is still working on that facet.
There's something deeply tragic about the idea that devising new ways to monetise and profit from activity is the definition of becoming more human.
We seem to have created an MBA-inspired nightmare where all social interactions become a meta-game of promotion, monetisation, and profit, and no activity can possibly have an intrinsic value unless it operates inside that context.
Having been raised with agency (being a military brat), its unconscionable to forfeit such an integral part of ones identity/culture and could be seen as an economic tramp stamp without even having to split any hairs.
"You're the product" is the oldest profession in the book and not a good look for many.
Most of these experiments come out of the US where there is overwhelming pressure by society that your value as a human is how well you can sell yourself. This is especially true as more and more people are priced out of broader economic participation by how high the cost of living is vs available income opportunity.
Nimby is a fickle mistress, though we can see in China as well as the US that property ownership is part of a warped mating ritual/tradition and has distorted "occupant owned" dwelling statistics (just as much as reits have). 3 for me, none for you was a different economic experiment afaic.
Are you listening to "I don't want to be you anymore" by Billie Eilish? The pressure you speak of may have a gender imbalance, but most guys are cool with a smooth operator (being good at what you do) and tend to avoid lip service.
Reminds me of Black Mirror's take on this in the episode 'Nosedive'. I don't believe we're far from it, especially as some of us mesh our real identities with our online ones.
tangential, but it seems that, in an effort to be pithy, your comment elides way too many independent clauses, and covers way too much ground across the sentences written. it's like trying to cross a canyon on dust, rather than a bridge.
concision relies on omitting unnecessary words, not whole phrases and sentences. i'd be hard-pressed to restate anything said here with any level of confidence.
If the "you're the product" and whore/prostitute reference eluded you in the reply, the 1st post split a few hairs for entertainment purposes, but the message was pretty clear....
If its an 8 hour workday, being able to make hypothetical emergency briefings at the office within 2 hours with no/short notice may be worth a 25% salary hike.
Its the new remote first companies that will exclusively hire for skill and balance the equation once the next wave gains more traction.