That's the result without wireguard. With wireguard:

> depending on the use case for a Pi Zero WireGuard server, it could get the job done with ~30-40 megabits per second speed capabilities.

Right you are! Was not clear at all at first glance.

In Europe, EASA recommends this since the Germanwings accident but it's not an actual rule, each company decides what they want to do.

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/74912/what-is-t...

France launched a similar program and publish everything they can on Github

See https://www.systeme-de-design.gouv.fr/ and https://github.com/GouvernementFR/dsfr

I find it really funny that it's published on GitHub with the MIT license, but with a disclaimer it's illegal to use it outside of government websites.

It's great that it's publicly available, like many other public stuff the French Government is doing like https://beta.gouv.fr/ or the tax calculators, but it's still funny.

The conditions in the disclaimer only apply to the French government. Translated with Firefox (which apparently still makes some typos):

> Conditions for the use of the Components by the Other Users

> All Other Users are allowed to use the source code according to the terms of the MIT license.

> Other Users are expressly reminded that any use of the Components outside the limits referred to herein or for the purpose of diverting them and otherwise appropriateing the State Mark is punishable by civil and/or criminal sanctions.

> Prohibited Use Outside Government Websites

It explicitly states it's forbidden to be used by private actors.

Oh, right, on the readme! That's so weird, because it kinda contradicts the "general conditions for use" document. I guess they mean the source code is ok to use but you must alter the design first? The UK's doesn't have such a dumb limitation.

Makes sense to me: MIT doesn't give a trademark / design mark license.

That seems unenforcable under a MIT license? Especially outside of France.

Governments can write laws to do whatever they like... And they have police to enforce stuff however they like.

How can French police enforce things outside of France?

Extradition, cooperation with other EU nations...

Or they just blow up your boat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior

The same way anyone enforces things outside of their borders, through force.

and Australia https://www.dta.gov.au/help-and-advice/digital-service-stand...

Here's Singapore's: https://www.designsystem.tech.gov.sg/

And the US: https://designsystem.digital.gov/

And Norway: https://www.designsystemet.no/

There is no frame around the window. The electrical door handle opens up a bit the window before unlocking the door to free it from the seal.

Without power the manual handle needs to do that also, which is more complicated that a "normal" door handle.

I have very little understanding on the power requirements for a window, but couldn't Tesla have just reserved some battery off the main battery as an emergency fallback? Just enough power to lower the windows to a safe route, maybe illuminate some LEDs on the emergency latches or paths to the emergency latches? I'm not really interested in discussing Tesla's intended design, but more from just a mechanical/electrical standpoint if it would be expensive (power wise) to have a reserve like this.

Edit: Also, I guess weight also of such a battery, but I suppose maybe the weight can be understood by how much reserve it would need.

It's not really complicated... it would be more expensive though.

The exploit will leak more or less random data (data which was accessed recently by the CPU). You cannot target a specific part of the memory, but you can keep fetching data until you get something interesting.

so if I wanted to test if it leaks my root password, I should run the code and open a terminal and say, upgrade packages, or upgrade packages before running the exploit code?

Your root password is stored as a hash. It could leak when you type it in sudo for instance.

Wat ?

Pretty sure they banned both?

Sadly no. They banned specific threads / subreddits, not the content.

ITER is built in France, but is financed by many countries outside of EU, including the USA. It's not a huge cost per-country.

> the ITER Members China, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States

See https://www.iter.org/proj/Countries

The list is already updated here: https://layoffs.fyi/

It would be really great if this broke out engineering from support and other roles.

Does it solves the issues with virtual dom ? It's a pain to manage.

The readme mentions iframes but not that.

This is also a sign that code reviews are not working properly (either missing due to a team too small; or not enough time invested to do them properly; or people are not "free" enough to tell their coworker that their code is bad; or it was done too late, once there isn't enough time to fix it; etc).

That's mostly an organisation failure.

Or code reviews are working fine but there are no long-term consequence for people whose code consistently takes 10x more revision after reviewing. (This is also a kind of organizational failure, but one where reprimanding the IC in question can still be the right response. But I also doubt a drive-by ad hoc external review of every person in the company is going to be the best approach to find this!)