Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | UltraSane's commentslogin

Marc Andreessen is a strong supporter of Trump.

Shut up or they will send you there ( by mistake for a year or two )

Lets be more accurate: none of the powerful & rich are strong supporters OF trump; they support him strongLY because of the direct pay-offs they personally gain. I think it's important to differentiate between the Andreessens and your core MAGA supporter who I actually believe he is a god, because strategies for defeating them are very different.

> none of the powerful & rich are strong supporters OF trump; they support him strongLY because of the direct pay-offs they personally gain.

A distinction without a difference.

"I stabbed you in the back because I wanted to steal your watch, not because I disliked you personally."


Nah, I genuinely believe that Andreessen believes much of what Trump believes.

This should NOT be flagged.

The minimum amount of energy needed to compute decreased asymptotically to 0 as the temperature of space goes to 0. This is the reason a common sci-fi trope where advanced civilizations hibernate for extremely long times so that they can do more computation with available energy.

That’s a common trope? Can’t say I’ve run into it. But I’d like to! What are some good examples?

In the book Calculating God, a character notes that this is a common civilization-wide choice. Living in virtual reality, rather than trying to expand into the vast expanses of space, is a common trope as much as it's a logical choice. It neatly explains the Fermi Paradox. In some fiction, like The Matrix, the choice might be forced due to cultural shifts, but the outcome is the same. A relatively sterile low-energy state civilization doing pure processing.

I wonder if it's illogical to think that all civilizations must always pick the most logical of the options

Those civilisations that make too much illogical choices probably die off.

True. But it's not a binary choice. All it takes is to make one sub-optmial choice for the universe to be filled up with von-neuman probes in all star systems

Kurzgesagt just made a video on it a couple months back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMm-U2pHrXE

Here you go: https://pastebin.com/raw/SUd5sLRC

And it only cost 0.006 rain forests!



Over regulation of nuclear energy in the US made it so expensive we didn't replace all fossil fuels with it.

I don't think this is true at all.

It's a heavy capex business with very small marginal returns, that takes planning on the order of decades.

AKA, a US company's worst nightmare. Investors don't like that shit, they like half-baked software that code monkeys can pump out.


A fully paid off nuclear reactor is extremely profitable because of little fuel cost.

Operating a commercial reactor and keeping it up to regulations isn’t exactly cheap. It requires people, periodic inspections, maintenance, and lots of paperwork to prove you are not cutting corners.

When the cost of people is more than the cost of equipment, upkeep and maintenance that is arguably exactly when overregulation becomes burdensome

"upkeep and maintenance" is largely composed of people costs – the people doing the upkeep and maintenance.

indeed, that's the case for many businesses, even with little-to-no regulation, so it's hard to agree with your opinion there.

e.g. most of the cost of hiring a plumber is a "cost of people" – buying torch fuel and fittings is a much smaller fraction of it.


I guess I should separate what I mean by this. If you need plumbing work usually you have to pull permits from the city, depending on where you live that could be a small portion of the cost or a large majority of the cost. I am not advocating for the removal of say skilled operators and technicians. I am against overwhelming bureaucracy with paper documents lengthy processing times and fringe regulations.

The biggest issues people usually have with any construction work is dealing with the city/county because they throw up the most roadblocks and you do not have the freedom to choose, in the case that there is no free market available the regulation must be good, cheap and efficient, a bit off topic but alas


> If you need plumbing work usually you have to pull permits from the city

Most work you'd hire a plumber for does not require any sort of permit. Fix a leak? Replace a toilet? Install a water hammer arrestor? Unclog a toilet? Hydrojet a sewer line? etc. None of those have ever required a single permit for me. A recent $450 quote to install another shutoff valve was about 95% labor, 5% parts, 0% bureaucracy.

In fact, I would be surprised if there was a single location in the US where permits constituted "a large majority of the costs" of plumbing work done in that location. I honestly don't know what you're talking about there. Maybe you could share such a location?

Indeed, the cost of most construction work is not dominated by any sort of bureaucracy or government-mandated paperwork, but by materials and people doing the work. If I bought a new house for $1M, regulation did not constitute $500,000 of it.

> The biggest issues people usually have with any construction work is dealing with the city/county because they throw up the most roadblocks and you do not have the freedom to choose

This is simply not the case. Maybe you're talking about the issues you personally have. The biggest issue people usually have with construction is the cost, and the biggest part of the cost is the labor and materials, because you live in a high-COL country. The current inflation and tariffs we're seeing don't help. I guess if we want to bring costs down by cutting regulation, the overwhelming tariffs (aka very expensive regulations) would be a good first target, and that would help address inflation, too – bonus cost savings!

> I am against overwhelming bureaucracy

So is everyone else, but is hiring a plumber expensive because of "overwhelming bureaucracy"? No, it's because it costs money to pay the people who do the work.


Nuclear power in a the US was collapsing due to cost and schedule overruns already before TMI.

Blaming regulations seems like trying to find a scapegoat rather than admitting reality.


async seems sensible for anything subject to internet latency.

Splunk is expensive but it makes searching logs so much faster and more effective. I think of it as SQL for unstructured data.

loki works great too and is FOSS

We really need an open-source implementation of the Splunk Query Language. The query language is what lets you actually find the few dozen relevant lines out of the billions of lines logged.

No man's sky generates nearly infinite variety but very little novelty.

The number of memory related bugs is absolutely a valid issue with C when the same bugs are impossible in Rust. The C memory model is a disaster when every computer is connected to the Internet.

You are saying the Rust bug in the kernel was impossible? How did it happen then? Come on guys.

A million memory error bugs is used as a valid argument to stop using C and switch to rust where such bugs are impossible.

Safe Rust absolutely eliminates entire categories of bugs

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: