I understand that, except the reported insured amount matches the reported amount of money lost in the scam, so as much as it adds up, it doesn't square with the rest of the article.
Just wanted to let you know that the qbix.com website navigation doesn't work, at least for me on mobile Firefox. Clicks sometimes open the submenu, but usually not. Clicks on the submenu don't work (they always seem go to the content in the background) and clicks on the main menu items usually don't work either.
Hi, great that you looked at it, unfortunately it doesn't work for me yet. I made a video. Good examples are at 3 seconds in (video starts playing) and 16 seconds in (I end up at the FTL website instead of the menu option). Halfway the video you can see that the Communities button doesn't work at that moment in time (earlier it did). Good luck!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-CVVxIicNqQJ8iz9EP0nBlroPAs...
The connection to the update server must be secured, but it might not be using SSL the way connections to websites normally do. Perhaps the local install has not been updated in a while, so neither have the details about the server certificate. Then the local install might not accept the update server's certificate because the expected details don't match.
I have occasionally seen this type of construction when doing integrations.
If time could automatically fix issues, then yeah, Google would have been perfect. But every company (including Google) have long-running issues that haven't been addressed for decades at this point, and if no one is getting promoted for fixing the issue (in this particular case of Google's inaction), it's unlikely to be fixed.
One reason is that someone else's platform means you don't have full control over presentation and discoverability.
Also, at some point in their existence each platform start to decline.
People move to the next platform and lose some of their readers. A few years later the same thing happens again, and readership is reduced again.
Personally I have had a lot of fun adding random bits to my website such as small tools, some explorations on creative expression with CSS and things like that.
I see what you mean, but at the same time it worked okay on my "generate markdown toc" script after removing all comments.
I'm surprised that it did so well.
The initial paragraph is wrong though. It takes markdown headings as input, it doesn't generate markdown headings.
This confusion makes it a lot less trustworthy.
Maybe it is coming now instead of earlier not because of a clear choice, but because to get features in to the project people need to spend their own free time on creating them.
Thank you Klemens Nanni and others for taking the time.
People would have a problem if they already have €120k tied up in a contract, such as a house purchase.
It would be a big problem if the lost money was intended for their pension.