Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LemonWho's commentslogin

I think the researcher (and probably a lot of the people engaging in this challenge) are missing one of the major benefits of these do nothing challenges. 4+ hours is excessive, but the main point is that modern life is just constant stimulation. From the moment I wake up to the moment I fall asleep it's just "input", news articles, social media content, TV shows. There is always something to consume.

Doing nothing for even just 15 minutes is a way to conciously stop consuming for a little bit.

I would also be interested to know about the researcher's relationship with their phone. If they aren't prone to doomscrolling it would probably be pretty hard to relate to the need/want to do nothing.


Imo new life is far less stimulating than old life.

Wander in the trees and your brain is processing all the light reflecting off surfaces at endless angles given textured surfaces everywhere. Brain be processing the crunch of the sticks and grass.

Reading books was at an all-time high. Ear training making music with friends, was a constant.

Physically sitting still staring at a 2D screen, saving the universe from yet another alien threat video game, scanning likely repetitive and meaningless social commentary since no one is taking salient actions, just spinning wheels in place... modern life can't compete with that information overload.

Modern life is actually whittled down to "protect big corp profits" via consumption of their media and services. It's the opposite of diverse. It is hypernormalized and stagnant


This reads as extremely "old man yells at clouds about kids these days". At no point does your comment come into contact with reality, just this confabulated idea of the world.


It's possible for people to have lived experiences that differ from yours.


This is the Charlie Kirk argument against gun control, "I'm ok with a small number of gun deaths, it's a small price to pay for freedom". All well and good until you become one of those gun deaths.


I agree with him by the way. But this kind of maximalist thought ending cliche is weird and anti intellectual.

One death of an amazon employee means we should change the whole system? A huge number of people are employed by them, enjoy their lives, became multi millionaires.

Why am I flagged for a fairly normal opinion? A few deaths are okay if the wast majority are satisfied?


You should definitely read "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" by Ursula Le Guin. It is short too!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: