Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | HardCodedBias's commentslogin

"They can't afford to fall behind on it."

They are very, very seriously far behind as of 3.0.

We'll see if 3.1 addresses the issue at all.


"These models are so powerful."

Careful.

Gemini simply, as of 3.0, isn't in the same class for work.

We'll see in a week or two if it really is any good.

Bravo to those who are willing to give up their time to test for Google to see if the model is really there.

(history says it won't be. Ant and OAI really are the only two in this race ATM).


LOL come on man.

Let's give it a couple of days since no one believes anything from benchmarks, especially from the Gemini team (or Meta).

If we see on HN that people are willing switching their coding environment, we'll know "hot damn they cooked" otherwise this is another wiff by Google.


You can’t put Gemini and Meta in the same sentence. Llama 4 was DOA, and Meta has given up on frontier models. Internally they’re using Claude.

After spending all that money and firing a bunch of people? Is the new group doing anything at this point?

They are busy demonstrating that Mark Zuckerberg has no sense at all.

Deepmind was their worst acquisition ever. It is a vanity project that burns cash.

Let's be real.

Google leadership is pathetic.

Sundar "the manager" has presided over an enormous growth of the businesses he was handed. He also presided over the complete collapse of the internal culture. OTOH he may have fired Dianne Green, so that's something. Overall, at best Meh.

Demis ran a startup that burnt cash on vanity projects and continues to burn cash on vanity projects. Gemini is barely open source quality AI, but Google makes it nearly free and has the best distribution on the planet.

Gemini has been a joke since 1.0. No release has hurt Google's brand more. 3.0 was STOA for about 2 days, easily Gemini's best release.

Anthropic and OAI are moving at amazing pace, Google can not keep up at all.


Their models are absolutely not impressive.

Not a single person is using it for coding (outside of Google itself).

Maybe some people on a very generous free plan.

Their model is a fine mid 2025 model, backed by enormous compute resources and an army of GDM engineers to help the “researchers” keep the model on task as it traverses the “tree of thoughts”.

But that isn’t “the model” that’s an old model backed by massive money.


Uhh, just false.

It's just poop tier.

Come on.

Worthless.

Do you have any market counter points.

Market counter points that aren't really just a repackaging of:

  1. "Google has the world's best distribution" and/or  
  2. "Google has a firehose of money that allows them to sell their 'AI product' at an enormous discount?
Good luck!

Always the same with Google.

Gemini has been way behind from the start.

They use the firehose of money from search to make it as close to free as possible so that they have some adoption numbers.

They use the firehose from search to pay for tons of researchers to hand hold academics so that their non-economic models and non-economic test-time-compute can solve isolated problems.

It's all so tiresome.

Try making models that are actually competitive, Google.

Sell them on the actual market and win on actual work product in millions of people lives.


I'm sorry but this is an insane take. Flash is leading its category by far. Absolutely destroys sonnet, 5.2 etc in both perf and cost.

Pro still leads in visual intelligence.

The company that most locks away their gold is Anthropic IMO and for good reason, as Opus 4.6 is expensive AF


I think we highly underestimate the amount of "human bots" basically.

Unthinking people programmed by their social media feed who don't notice the OpenAI influence campaign.

With no social media, it seems obvious to me there was a massive PR campaign by OpenAI after their "code red" to try to convince people Gemini is not all that great.

Yea, Gemini sucks, don't use it lol. Leave those resources to fools like myself.


I saw this movie! It was awesome.

When that wave washed over New York, awesome! The freezing helicopter, woot!

I also liked the South Park parody.


If this pricing ratio holds it is going to mint money for Cerebras.

Many suspected a 2x premium for 10x faster. It looks like they may have been incorrect.


"The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake."

The answer to this is two part:

1. Have we seen an increase in capability over the last couple of years? The answer here is clearly yes.

2. Do we think that this increase will continue? This is unknown. It seems so, but we don't know and these firms are clearly betting that it will.

1a. Do we think that with existing capability that there is tremendous latent demand? If so the buildout is still rational if progress stops.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: